So Mary Cheney is about to bring a child into the world?.
Interesting considering the fact that she is unmarried and she has confessed to being a lesbian.
Conservatives do not want to discuss the fact that the daughter of our "conservative" Vice-President has chosen to indulge her passions in a lifestyle about which God has clearly stated his disapproval. Obviously, the fact that she had fornicated is not a problem either. Yes -I consider the act of getting a sperm- even from the neighborhood "bank", an act of fornication.
OK - I have no problem with the baby, babies are a direct blessing from God, but would my fellow conservatives be equally happy if Rosie O'Donnell impregnated herself?
Nope- they would be livid-
Obviously Mary Cheney has a womb encrusted with diamonds, and such a womb must be filled with life.
Obviously, the conservatives have decided to practice situational ethics????
Maybe they feel that you can't "argue with the landlord".
My point is that parentless children are forced to suffer in this country because lesbians and homosexuals are "not fit" to serve as parents, and the majority of conservatives would rather see a kid shuffled from home to home than loved by those homosexuals. So now I am confused- I am a conservative Republican and again I find myself wanting to vomit of this hypocracy.
President Bush recently said:
“I think Mary is going to be a loving soul to her child, and I’m happy for her.”
HUH!
Are we for gay parenting or are we against it, because gosh darn it, I am not sure what kind of Mom Mary would make but Rosie seems like a loving Mom??
So are the conservative pundits, bloggers and politicians now 'for' gay parenting or are the gays still going to hell?
Don't get me wrong, I am a strict constructionist when it comes to the holy Bible, but I am a little concerned when there is an additional deck of cards being shuffled by those who 'represent' the 'christian right'.
As a Mom I totally understand a womans' desire to procreate- but if we are led to condemn those who live against God, as being 'not good enough' to raise children who need love, then we should strongly voice our opposition of a woman who clearly violates the law under which this administration claims to support.
If Mary and her gay lover are OK to raise, love and support a child, shouldn't a couple of double income women or men with no kids, be allowed to raise, love and support children whose parents have thrown them away.
This is nuts - it seems that most conservatives are more concerned about how the President looks than about what God knows.
Merry Christmas people- remember Jesus Christ this season, and the fact that he loves and wants the best for ALL children, not only those born under the protection of political power.
No comments:
Post a Comment